Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Brown, 536 P.2d 1047.

26 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
225 , which our supreme court affirmed and approved in State v. Brown (Brown II)
State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian Carr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
3 aff’d P.2d 1047 (1975).
State v. Snider 835 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Snider 835 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Robbins 803 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Robbins 803 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Kanuck v. Meehan 798 P.2d 420 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Kanuck v. Meehan 798 P.2d 420 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
225, 230 , , approved in part, , and Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
State v. Manning 692 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Manning 692 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
The intention to eliminate rule 32 post-conviction relief as a remedy for one who is being held in custody after his probation or parole has been unlawfully revoked is sub *141 stantiated further by the Arizona Supreme Court’s
State v. Tulipane 596 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1979
State v. Tulipane 596 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1979
In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S 580 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S 580 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
225, 230 , approved in part
State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
State v. Wynn 562 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Wynn 562 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Gomez 540 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1975
State v. Gomez 540 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1975
State v. Barnett 540 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1975
State v. Barnett 540 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1975
we held that persons seeking relief of this nature must, on or after August 1, 1975, proceed via appeal, and until this date the dissatisfied probationer has the alternative of appealing or filing a Rule 32 petition.