DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pakula, 547 P.2d 476.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Ellis 572 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Risher 574 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Williams 564 P.2d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Williams 564 P.2d 1255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Zamora 559 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Zamora 559 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Weigel 554 P.2d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
  • State v. Weigel 554 P.2d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
    appellant questions the legality of the sentence contending that the trial court does not have authority to impose consecutive conditions of probation.
  • State v. Castro 554 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Castro 554 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. McClarity 557 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. McClarity 557 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    our Supreme Court stated: “The legislature sets the sentencing limits and distributes the authority to control the sentence, within those limits, in the courts, correctional authority, and the parole board.” at 479 .
  • State v. Pitts 548 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Pitts 548 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    P.2d 409 (1953); , 293 P. 23 (1930); , 246 P. 550 (1926).