Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mincey, 636 P.2d 637.

105 citing documents.

State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Brita 761 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1988
State v. Brita 761 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1988
613 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974); , 402 n. 2, , 650 n. 2 (1981).
State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Cole 734 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Cole 734 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
takes from a defendant a right essential to his defense.” , cert.
State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In holding RAJI 4.01 constituted fundamental rather than merely reversible error, , cert.
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
State v. Ferguson 717 P.2d 879 Ariz. 1986
State v. O'Haire 720 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. O'Haire 720 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
at 454 , 666 P.2d at 1063 ( , ).
State v. Sterling 713 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Sterling 713 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Anzivino 716 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Anzivino 716 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
takes from a defendant a right essential to his defense.’ ” , , cert.
State v. Barnett 691 P.2d 683 Ariz. 1984
State v. Barnett 691 P.2d 683 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hunter 688 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hunter 688 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1984
Rather, it is the state’s responsibility to prove the element beyond a reasonable doubt.” , cert.
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Mincey [Mincey II], , cert.
State v. Wussler 679 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1984
State v. Wussler 679 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1984
Pool v. Superior Court 677 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1984
Pool v. Superior Court 677 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1984
See State v. Williams , , 229 , , 1211 (1982); State v. Mincey , , cert.
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
State v. Oppenheimer 673 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Oppenheimer 673 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Moya 672 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Moya 672 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Moya 667 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Towns 667 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Moya 667 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the defendant contends that the foregoing instruction unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to him.
State v. Towns 667 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Earby 665 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Earby 665 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
2450 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979)
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
State v. Forrester 657 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982