DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mincey, 566 P.2d 273.

31 citing documents.

  • State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    rev’d on other grounds, 437 U.S. 385 (1978).
  • State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
    (scienter inferred in felony murder statute), rev’d on other grounds, 437 U.S. 385 (1978).
  • State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
  • State v. Hughes 938 P.2d 457 Ariz. 1997
    Defendant allegedly said, “I don’t *71 do chickenshit stuff like that, if I have something out for someone I kill them.” The trial judge admitted the remark as a statement of intent, see Rule 803(3), Ariz. R.Evid., , rev’d, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Averyt 876 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Averyt 876 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
    rev’d on other grounds, Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
    This burden of proof is not met, however, when “evidence as to one set of charges would have been admissible at the trial on the other set ‘as part of the complete picture.’ ” Via, 146 Ariz. at 115 , 704 P.2d at 245 , , rev’d on other grounds, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
    State *427 v. Mincey, , rev’d on other grounds, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Sanchez 797 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Sanchez 797 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
    reversed on other grounds, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Thompson v. State 384 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
    State v. Mincey [Mincey I]
  • State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
    Following a jury trial, we reversed on two counts, , [hereinafter Mincey I], and the United States Supreme Court reversed on the remaining counts, Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dickey 608 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Dickey 608 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1980
    lped him up, he came back and one of the customers there said to him, ‘Well, boy, living out there where you do, you know, what would you do if you ever had any trouble or was hurt or needed help,’ or something to that effect, and he says, T don’t worry about it, I always carry a bit in my truck,’ he said, ‘If anybody ever messes with me, I’ll blow them away.’ ” Appellant, , rev’d on other grounds, Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct.
  • State v. Siqueiros 591 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. Siqueiros 591 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
    His motion to suppress evidence seized by the police in a , which subsequently was reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • State v. Jones 587 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Tucker 574 P.2d 1295 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Fournier 570 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Fournier 570 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977