Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Steelman, 612 P.2d 475.
- State v. Thomas 175 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
- State v. Thomas 175 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
- State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
-
State v. Smith
159 P.3d 531
Ariz. 2007
See Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354, 361 (1957); ( P.2d 475 (1980)).
- State v. Thompson 7 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
State v. Thompson
7 P.3d 151
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Two years later, when construing section 13-604, the Arizona Supreme Court observed that “[b]oth the prior conviction and the prior offense must have occurred before the second offense was committed.”
- State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
- State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Williams
904 P.2d 437
Ariz. 1995
“Convictions entered prior to a sentencing hearing may thus be considered regardless of the order in which the underlying crimes occurred or the order in which the convictions were entered.” Gretzler, 135 Ariz. at 57 n. 2, 659 P.2d at 16 n. 2 (citations omitted); , (holding that murders committed after the charged murder can support a section 13-703(F)(2) finding), ce rt.
- State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Cornell
878 P.2d 1352
Ariz. 1994
(constitutionally infirm conviction cannot be used to enhance charge or sentencing in later proceedings); , cert.
- State v. Burkett 876 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Burkett 876 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
-
State v. Comer
799 P.2d 333
Ariz. 1990
State v. LaGrand, *430 , , , , , , cert.
- State v. Zmich 770 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Zmich
770 P.2d 776
Ariz. 1989
18.1(b), 17 A.R.S.; -25 , -81 , cert.
- State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
-
State v. Smith
707 P.2d 289
Ariz. 1985
We acknowledge that an invalid prior conviction cannot be used as an aggravating circumstance to support the imposition of the death penalty, -24 , -80 , cert.
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Richmond
666 P.2d 57
Ariz. 1983
We addressed this issue in State v. Blazak, supra, where we stated, “[njeither this court nor the United States Supreme Court has found that the right to a speedy trial extends to sentencing.” 131 Ariz. at 600 , 643 P.2d at 696
- State v. Gerlaugh 659 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Rybolt 650 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Rybolt 650 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Blazak 643 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Blazak 643 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
- Davis v. SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF PIMA 617 P.2d 520 Ariz. 1980