DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Scott, 555 P.2d 1117.

142 citing documents.

  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Hearn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the denial of a Rule 20 motion and the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction de novo, Harm, 236 Ariz. at 406, ¶ 11 ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Cochran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We do not reweigh the evidence and will reverse only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” -25 (1976) (); (“The finder-of-fact, not the appellate court, weighs the evidence and determines the credibility of witnesses.”) ().
  • State v. Cochran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    We will reverse a conviction 3 STATE v. COCHRAN Decision of the Court for insufficiency of evidence only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” – 25 (1976).
  • State v. Valentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Valentine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
  • State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Ballesteros Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    4 STATE v. BALLESTEROS Decision of the Court facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Petersen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Petersen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Stiefel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Lombardo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Hassan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Lombardo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Hassan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Reversible error based on insufficient evidence “occurs only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
  • State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (- 25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ( STATE v. CORTEZ Decision of the Court 424-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶ 16, (“[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (citation omitted)); -25, - 19 (1976) (“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.”).
  • State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based 3 STATE v. CARRIER Decision of the Court on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25, –19 (1976)).
  • State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Humelhans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See State v. Soto–Fong, (“’Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.’”) (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Krentiras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25, -19 (1976)).
  • State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ―Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a 3 STATE v. CARDENAS-SALCIDO Decision of the Court complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.‖ (-25, -19 (1976)).