Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dale, 550 P.2d 83.

50 citing documents.

State v. Aumiller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Aumiller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The propriety of a trial court’s denial of a severance motion is determined “based on the showing at the time the motion is made and not what ultimately transpires at the trial.”
State v. Carr 743 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1987
State v. Carr 743 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1987
State v. Rivera, 139 Ariz. at 410 , 678 P.2d at 1374
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
(no abuse of discretion where defendant offered a ride to each victim and beat each before raping her); , (factors to consider in determining whether severance is appropriate include closeness in time of the incidents, locations, and the criminal
State v. Lawson 698 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lawson 698 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1985
State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Roper 682 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Roper 682 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
It is settled that a defendant must demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion with respect to the trial court’s decision to join offenses, based on a showing at the time the motion is made and not what ultimately transpires at trial, , and a trial court possesses broad discretion in the area of joinder and severance.
State v. Rivera 678 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1984
State v. Rivera 678 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1984
Standard of Review Appellate courts will not reverse the trial court's ruling under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule absent a clear abuse of discretion
State v. Yslas 676 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1984
State v. Yslas 676 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1984
State v. Starcevich 678 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Starcevich 678 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
As we have stated: “The appellant must demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion with respect to the trial court’s decision to join the offenses, ‘based on the showing at the time the motion is made and not what ultimately transpires at the trial.’ (citation omitted)”
State v. Yee 590 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Yee 590 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Jones 587 P.2d 742 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jones 587 P.2d 742 Ariz. 1978
Recently, , this court indicated that: “The phrase ‘common scheme or plan’ as employed in Rule 13.3(a) bears the same meaning as ‘common scheme or plan’ used in the context of the exception to the rule against the use of evidence in one prosecution tending to prove the commission of a crime distinct
State v. Hughes 584 P.2d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Hughes 584 P.2d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Tipton 581 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Tipton 581 P.2d 231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jones 587 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Jones 587 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Williams, supra; 8 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 14.02[1], supra.
State v. Fournier 570 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Fournier 570 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Mincey 566 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1977
State v. Mincey 566 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1977
State v. Druke 564 P.2d 913 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Druke 564 P.2d 913 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Pierce 555 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Pierce 555 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976