DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Wilson, 555 P.2d 321.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland 509 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
  • State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland 509 P.3d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
    struction, see Fulminante, if it is presented repeatedly, see Williams, 133 Ariz. at 227, if it is argued in closing, if it 15 STATE v. COPELAND Opinion of the Court identifies the defendant as the perpetrator, (reasoning erroneously admitted hearsay was harmless, in part because it did not identify the defendant as the perpetrator), and when it goes directly to a critical issue, see Bass
  • Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    at 226, 650 P.2d at 1208
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
    See, e.g., Greenawalt, 128 Ariz. at 164, 624 P.2d at 842
  • State v. Simms 863 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Simms 863 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    is not within any relevant non-hearsay rule, the court erred in admitting it.”); , , (why undercover investigation undertaken immaterial).
  • State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Cocio 709 P.2d 1336 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Cocio 709 P.2d 1336 Ariz. 1985
    (erroneous admission of evidence which is entirely cumulative constitutes harmless error)
  • State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Wise 671 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Wise 671 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    (where the evidence precludes the jury from reasonably finding that the state failed to prove the distinguishing element of the higher offense, it is not necessary to instruct on a lesser offense, therefore it was not error to deny an instruction on theft where the evidence clearly showed money was taken at gunpoint); , (defendant entitled to instructions on the lesser offense if a reasonable interpretation of the evidence indicates that he could be guilty of these offenses; however, defendant n
  • State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Sourivathong 636 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Sourivathong 636 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Butcher 585 P.2d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. Butcher 585 P.2d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. Mayhew 555 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
  • State v. Mayhew 555 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976