Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cook, 564 P.2d 877.

83 citing documents.

State v. Piller 628 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
which casts doubt on the “exigent circumstance” exception to the rule, our supreme court has recognized exceptions.
State v. Sanchez 627 P.2d 676 Ariz. 1981
State v. Sanchez 627 P.2d 676 Ariz. 1981
1 We have held a former Arizona statute 2 imposing the knock and announce rule to be applicable to the pushing open of a
State v. Lane 625 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Lane 625 P.2d 949 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Sanchez 627 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Sanchez 627 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Eminowicz, 21 Ariz.App.
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Warren 603 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Warren 603 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Love 598 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1979
State v. Love 598 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1979
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1979
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1979
we stated that § 13-1411 does not provide exceptions for exigent circumstances.
State v. Siqueiros 591 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Siqueiros 591 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Warren 589 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Warren 589 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Viewing the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the denial of the motion to suppress, , we affirm.
State v. Shinault 584 P.2d 1204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Shinault 584 P.2d 1204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
However, , we held that under Art. 2, § 8, of the Arizona Constitution and under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, a warrantless entry into a dwelling in order to effect an arrest is per se unreasonable absent exigent circumstances.
State v. Ferguson 579 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1978
State v. Ferguson 579 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1978
Recently, , this court discussed the question of a warrantless entry into a home to effect an arrest.
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Cf. State v. Cook, Ariz.
State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977
State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977