Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. White, 564 P.2d 888.

26 citing documents.

State v. Risner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Risner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶12 Finally, while a prosecutor cannot “convey his personal belief about the credibility of a witness,” ¶ 54 (2003) (), he may certainly comment on a witness’s bias or prejudice, or lack thereof, see, ¶ 17 (App. 2002)
State v. Offret Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Offret Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Botkin 209 P.3d 137 Ariz. 2009
State v. Botkin 209 P.3d 137 Ariz. 2009
(holding that the court lacks authority to revoke probation after period of probation expires).
In Re Stephanie N. 110 P.3d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Stephanie N. 110 P.3d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-04 , -93 (1977) (improper comment on credibility of state’s witness did not require reversal); , (prosecutor’s statement that state would not waste time bringing a case if the investigating officer were not believed did not require r
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Johnson 893 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Johnson 893 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Corcoran 735 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Corcoran 735 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1987
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
United States v. Haynes, 573 F.2d 236 (5th Cir.), cert.
State v. Melendez 588 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1978
State v. Melendez 588 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1978
State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977
State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977