DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Arnett, 608 P.2d 778.

29 citing documents.

  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Arnett 760 P.2d 1064 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Arnett 760 P.2d 1064 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
    advises that when a defendant is to be resentenced in death cases, evidence and testimony should be as fresh as possible, and that relying on a previous hearing on mitigation and aggravation conducted months before the imposition of the death penalty is not recommended.
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
    (21-year-old defendant without any prior violent offenses committed murder while his reasoning ability was clouded by drugs, a drug habit that began with prescription drug usage at the age of seven); , (defendant was homosexually assaulted as a child and had a dismal home environment).
  • State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
    338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980); , State v. Evans, supra.
  • State v. Smith 687 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Smith 687 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
    we said that relying on the transcript of the first sentencing was not a good practice.
  • State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
    d at 696 ; State v. Smith, supra, 131 Ariz. at 29-30 , 638 P.2d at 696-97 ; State v. Schad, supra, 129 Ariz. at 574 , 633 P.2d at 383 ; State v. Greenawalt, supra, 128 Ariz. at 174 , 624 P.2d at 852 ; State v. Bishop, supra, 127 Ariz. at 533 , 622 P.2d at 480 ; State v. Jordan, supra, 126 Ariz. at 286 , 614 P.2d at 828 ; Steelman II, supra, 126 Ariz. at 20-21, 612 P.2d at 476-77; , State v. Watson, supra, 120 Ariz. at 453-54 , 586 P.2d at 1265-66 .
  • State v. Smith 638 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Smith 638 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1981
    338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980); , , , cert.
  • State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
    408 , 66 L.Ed.2d 251 (1980) (four prior convictions); , (one prior conviction).
  • State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
    See State v. Watson, supra; , State v. Jordan, supra; State v. Steelman, supra; , , State v. Evans, supra.
  • State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Jordan 614 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Jordan 614 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1980
    we said that Lockett did not prohibit the death sentence in a felony-murder case where the defendant intentionally shot the victim.
  • State v. Steelman 612 P.2d 475 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Steelman 612 P.2d 475 Ariz. 1980
    at 2969 and 2972, 57 L.Ed.2d at 996 and 999, we stated: “Even if the language by the two justices were the holding of the United States Supreme Court, we do not feel that it would apply under the circumstances herein.”