Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Myers, 570 P.2d 1252.

124 citing documents.

State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
Where the identity of the defendant is an issue, “any fact which tends to establish identity has a probative value and if offered for that purpose it is receivable.” , ( , cert.
State v. Dungan 718 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Dungan 718 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
-91 , -64 (1977) (not cruel or unusual in sentencing offender to serve a sentence of 50 years to life for armed robbery to consider the defendant’s use of a sawed-off shotgun, his progressive tendency toward violent crime and that he posed a danger to society); State v. Meeker, supra, (no abuse o
State v. Bauer 704 P.2d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Bauer 704 P.2d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Lucero 692 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1984
State v. Lucero 692 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1984
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); , cert.
State v. Ross 696 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Ross 696 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Miller, supra; , , , cert.
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
The fact that a judge may have an opinion as to the merits of the cause or a strong feeling about the type of litigation involved, does not make the judge biased or prejudiced.” , cert.
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
We have stated that rule 10.1(b) “is properly interpreted to mean that a motion for change of judge for cause is deemed timely filed only if filed within ten days after discovery of the grounds for the change,” , cert.
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); , cert.
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
1492 , 71 L.Ed.2d 693 (1982), , cert.
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1982
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1982
State v. Menard 661 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Menard 661 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Geschwind 666 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Geschwind 666 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. DeRosier 650 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1982
State v. DeRosier 650 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1982
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. McElyea 635 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1981
State v. McElyea 635 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1981
255 n. 1, , 318 n. 1 (1981); , cert, denied, 435 U.S. 928 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Morales 630 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1981
State v. Morales 630 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1981
State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Skelton 629 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Skelton 629 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 625 P.2d 316 Ariz. 1981
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 625 P.2d 316 Ariz. 1981
1569, 1574 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976); -88
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
tate, , 213 P. 1011, 1012 (1923): “The general rule is that, in the prosecution of one accused of a particular offense, evidence showing or tending to show the commission by accused of another crime entirely distinct and independent of that for which he is on trial, * * * is neither relevant nor admissible.” While we agree with the statement of the rule, , cert.
State v. Tresize 623 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
State v. Tresize 623 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
instructs us that the police may make a full search of a person incident to a lawful custodial arrest and that an arrest is lawful without a warrant if there exists probable cause to believe a felony has been committed and probable cause to believe the person to be arrested has commit