Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gretzler, 659 P.2d 1.

292 citing documents.

State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
Amaya-Ruiz, 166 Ariz. at 178 , 800 P.2d at 1286 (-52 , -11 , cert.
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
898 , 88 L.Ed.2d 932 (1986) (victims were forced to lie down on a bed and except for the first victim, each endured the shooting of a loved one within their hearing); McCall, 139 Ariz. at 161 , 677 P.2d at 934 (same); , , cert.
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
-84 , -37 (1986) (finding of aggravating and mitigating circumstances by a jury is not constitutionally required); State v. Gretzler (Gretzler II), , , cert.
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
State v. Robinson 796 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1990
State v. Robinson 796 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
2259 , 72 L.Ed.2d 863 (1982), rev’d on other grounds, , 57 n. 2, , 16 n. 2, cert.
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Stevens 764 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1988
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
We have defined the terms cruel, heinous, , cert.
State v. Johnson 710 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1985
State v. Johnson 710 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1985
Heinous and depraved conduct pertains “to the mental state and attitude of the perpetrator as reflected in his words and actions.” State v. Gretzler, 135 Ariz. *401 42, 51
State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
at 876 , 71 L.Ed.2d at 11 ; , (defendant was 20 at the time of the crime); , (defendant was 22 at the time of the crime).
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 207 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
Rather, it appears that the court found this to be a mitigating factor but not “sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” , , cert.
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 207 Ariz. 1985
The court used defendant’s close family ties as a mitigating circumstance but devalued it to the point that it was not “sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” , , cert.
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
Of course, once proven by a preponderance of the evidence, the question before the court is still whether the mitigating circumstances are “sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” , , cert.
State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
199 , 78 L.Ed.2d 174 (1983); , , cert.
State v. Hensley 691 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1984
State v. Hensley 691 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1984
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984