Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Melendez, 588 P.2d 294.
- State v. Morse 617 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Fendler
622 P.2d 23
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
While it is a fundamental principle of law that a defendant is entitled to an instruction on a defensive theory for which there is any foundation in the evidence, , P.2d 53 (1974); there was no evidence presented at trial that appellant or anyone else ever consulted attorney David M. West or any other counsel concerning the propriety of the entries associated with adjusting journal entry 74-1.
- State v. Brooks 618 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Brooks
618 P.2d 624
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
“A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on any theory of his case reasonably supported by the evidence, [citation omitted], but instructions need not be given if their substance is covered by other instructions given by the trial court.”
- State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Gretzler
612 P.2d 1023
Ariz. 1980
See Rule 18.5(d), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
- State v. Madsen 609 P.2d 1046 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Madsen 609 P.2d 1046 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Skaggs 586 P.2d 1279 Ariz. 1978