Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Skaggs, 586 P.2d 1279.
- State v. Romero 463 P.3d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Romero
463 P.3d 225
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Corley, 108 Ariz. at 243 ( (McFarland, J., specially concurring)); (citing Malumphy).
- State v. Suggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Suggs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶9 a case involving an insanity defense and asserted religious bias, in which our supreme court noted that due process requires the superior court to examine an issue if "there was a nexus shown between the prejudice feared and the issues of the case."
- State v. Tamplin 986 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- State v. Tamplin 986 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
- State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Amarillas 688 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Amarillas 688 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
- State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Lopez 657 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Lopez 657 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Harmon 643 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Harmon 643 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Torres 620 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
-
State v. Torres
620 P.2d 224
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
However, , : “(T)hese rules do not apply when defendant raises the issue of insanity.
- State v. Rodriguez 612 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Rodriguez 612 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Barnes 606 P.2d 802 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Barnes 606 P.2d 802 Ariz. 1980