DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ferguson, 579 P.2d 559.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
  • State v. Scott 865 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1993
    and whether the authorities are honest with the accused.”
  • State v. Gordon 778 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1989
  • Distinguished State v. Gordon 778 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1989
    (Struckmeyer, V.C.J., specially concurring).
  • Nalbandian v. Superior Court 786 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • Nalbandian v. Superior Court 786 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    See Rule 31.11, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure
  • State v. Vaughn 708 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Vaughn 708 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
    this Court held that the elimination of evidence supporting the murder conviction did not leave sufficient evidence to support the armed robbery charge.
  • State v. Albe 713 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Albe 713 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    the trial court has no jurisdiction to modify a sentence while a case is on appeal.
  • State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Thurman 657 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Thurman 657 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Rumsey 636 P.2d 1209 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Rumsey 636 P.2d 1209 Ariz. 1981
    * * * Accordingly, the robbery conviction and sentence are set aside.”
  • State v. Seats 638 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Seats 638 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Edwards 594 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Edwards 594 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1979
    See, e. g., , , , , , , cert.
  • State v. Love 598 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. Love 598 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
    Our Supreme Court has recently held that “where there are exigent circumstances, a warrantless arrest in a private home may be made if there is probable cause.” State v. Ferguson, Ariz.
  • State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
    we held that where exigent circumstances exist, officers may enter a private home without a warrant to make an arrest.