DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hunt, 577 P.2d 717.

29 citing documents.

  • State v. Braidick 295 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • State v. Braidick 295 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • State v. Rojers 169 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Rojers 169 P.3d 651 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    Comm’n, , , 577 P.2d, 717, 722 (1978); , Southwestern Freight Lines, -67 , , ).
  • State v. Castro 788 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Castro 788 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • Matheny v. Gila County 710 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • Matheny v. Gila County 710 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
    “Appellate courts will often utilize the doctrine to add facts necessary to affirm the trial court.” Udall & Livermore, Law of Evidence, § 151 (2d ed.1982), , , Southwestern Freight Lines
  • State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • Distinguished State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    The Arizona cases, , , State v. Sardo, supra, and State v. Benge, supra, are distinguishable in that they involved vehicles stopped on the highway or while occupied by suspects, so that the possibility of the vehicle’s removal from the jurisdiction at the time of the seizure was real.
  • State v. Laughter 625 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • State v. Laughter 625 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
    and State v. Warren, 26 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Lawrence 599 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Lawrence 599 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1979
  • State v. Gonzales 596 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Gonzales 596 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Junkin 599 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Junkin 599 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Montano 589 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. Montano 589 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. McGuire 601 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
  • State v. McGuire 601 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
    213 P. 1005 (1923) (the only practical way to explode dynamite is with detonating or fulminating caps); , (Dilaudid is the trade name for hydromorphone which is a derivative of morphine).
  • State v. Walker 579 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Walker 579 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1978