DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Edwards, 665 P.2d 59.

82 citing documents.

  • State v. Mokake 829 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Mokake 829 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
    2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980)
  • State v. Nunez 806 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Nunez 806 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1991
    Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that “reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Mathers 796 P.2d 866 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Mathers 796 P.2d 866 Ariz. 1990
    Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and is such proof that “reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • State v. Vincent 768 P.2d 150 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Vincent 768 P.2d 150 Ariz. 1989
    Correia *433 tively, even though the Arizona confrontation clause explicitly provides the right to meet adverse witnesses face-to-face, we have never interpreted that provision “literally to require the exclusion of all statements of persons who do not appear at trial.” , see also Robinson, 153 Ariz. at 203 , 735 P.2d at 813 ; Vess, 157 Ariz. at 238 , 756 P.2d at 335 .
  • State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
    2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980); Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 24
  • State v. Spinks 752 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Spinks 752 P.2d 8 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1987
    Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 24; , U.S. Const. amend.
  • State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
    2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980) , (adopting Roberts), two cases involving attempts by the State to introduce former testimony of an absent witness.
  • State v. Hutchinson 688 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Hutchinson 688 P.2d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
    (hearsay admissible to show good faith effort to locate a witness); , (chain of evidence); , (certification of documentary evidence) , (App.
  • State v. Canaday 684 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Canaday 684 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    464 , 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982)
  • State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II 678 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II 678 P.2d 1386 Ariz. 1984
    § 1-244; , (statute in effect at time of the crime is applicable); -76 , -26 (App. 1983) (applying A.R.S.
  • State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Hallman 668 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Hallman 668 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1983