Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valencia, 645 P.2d 239.

63 citing documents.

State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
(defendant’s capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of act, his drug addiction caused by mental health treatment since age seven, his lack of adult convictions, his non-violent juvenile criminal record, and fact that friend influenced him at time of crime outweighed fact that crime was committed with expectation of pecuniary gain); , (defendant's youth outweighed previous felony convictions involving threat or use of violence); , (finding that defendant was young, that he had been a model prisoner,
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
While youth is certainly a mitigating factor, , we believe that its impact here is minimized by the extent and duration of Gillies’ participation in the murder.
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
ances of the present case are more analogous to Harding, Schad and Arnett than cases in which we have reduced the sentence imposed to life imprisonment, , (we found as a sufficiently substantial mitigating circumstance significant evidence that defendant and his accomplice did not intend to kill the victim) , (age of defendant at time of offense, 16, a significant mitigating factor).
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
(defendant did not intend to kill); , (substantial mental impairment due to medically-induced drug addiction, neurological problems, and brain damage; vulnerability to influence; lack of pri- or record of violence); , (extreme youth of defendant — sixteen years old at the time of his crime); , (convincing evidence of change of defendant’s character and goals while in prison; youth of defendant; murder occurred as the result of a shootout begun by robbery victim
State v. Graham 660 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1983
State v. Graham 660 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1983
While young age is a mitigating factor, , we give it little weight here.
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
The extreme youth of an offender can also be a compelling mitigating circumstance