Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Decker, 580 P.2d 333.

30 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey Cheatham 375 P.3d 66 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey Cheatham 375 P.3d 66 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-02 , -84 (1970); State v. Raymond, 21 Ariz.App.
State of Arizona v. Bradley Harold Wilson 350 P.3d 800 Ariz. 2015
State of Arizona v. Bradley Harold Wilson 350 P.3d 800 Ariz. 2015
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Aguilar 267 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Aguilar 267 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(explaining police officers needed both probable cause and exigent circumstances to enter a hotel room without consent or a warrant).
State v. Affordable Bail Bonds 6 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Affordable Bail Bonds 6 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(hotel room qualifies as a residential structure under Arizona’s similarly broad burglary statute); , (hotel room is as much the object of Fourth Amendment protection as a home or office).
State v. Hussain 942 P.2d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Hussain 942 P.2d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
408, 413 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966) ("What the Fourth Amendment protects is the security a man relies upon when he places himself or his property within a constitutionally protected area, be it his home or his office, his hotel room or his automobile.”)
State v. Kosman 892 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Kosman 892 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-98 , -36 (1978), the Arizona Supreme Court held that the smell of marijuana emanating from a residence could provide officers with probable cause and was an exigent circumstance justifying entry into the residence without a warrant.
State v. Silva 670 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Silva 670 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Cooper 636 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Cooper 636 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
(holding that the smell of burnt marijuana coming from under the door of a motel room was sufficient probable cause to believe that someone in the room had recently or was then smoking marijuana and that even though the officers did not know which occupant may have been violating the law, the thr
State v. Piller 628 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Piller 628 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Reuben 612 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Reuben 612 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
However, we do not find the majority opinion in Hilber to be persuasive
State v. Valenzuela 589 P.2d 1306 Ariz. 1979
State v. Valenzuela 589 P.2d 1306 Ariz. 1979
(sense of smell); , (sense of hearing); State v. McGuire, 13 Ariz.App.