Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Smith, 638 P.2d 696.

32 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussen 396 P.3d 1095 Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussen 396 P.3d 1095 Ariz. 2017
are inapplicable” when a defendant asserts an insanity defense and requests the court appoint an expert to examine him); (“Since the appellant was examined at his own request, the exposure which was invited was a clear waiver of constitutional guarantees.”).
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith (Smith II)
State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-506561 893 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-506561 893 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(“ ‘[Sjince the appellant was examined at his own request, the exposure which was invited was a clear waiver of constitutional guarantees.’ , ”).
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
-31 , -98 (1982) (defendant was convicted of two counts of first degree murder, and conviction on each count was used as an aggravating circumstance for the other count).
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. LaGrand, *430 , , , , , , cert.
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
(death penalty upheld when trial' court found no mitigating circumstances and found aggravating circumstances of prior convictions punishable by life imprisonment, offense committed in an especially heinous, cruel or depraved manner and prior conviction involving violence); State v. Mata, 125 Ari
State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
We have previously held that, under these circumstances, the fifth amendment protections of Estelle are inapplicable, because “[s]ince the appellant was examined at his own request, the exposure which was invited was a clear waiver of constitutional guarantees.”
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
See State v. (Joseph Clarence) Smith, , (positive testimony of state’s experts outweighs equivocal testimony of defense witnesses).
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. at 161 n. 4, *505 677 P.2d at 920 n. 4, see also State v. Gretzler, 135 Ariz. at 54, 659 P.2d at 13 , , -206 , -61 (1977).
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 207 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 207 Ariz. 1985
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
See, e.g., State v. *162 Jeffers, supra (defendant beat dead victim about the face and buried body in a shallow grave); State v. Woratzeck, supra (defendant strangled the victim, stabbed her three times in the chest, and struck her twice on the head, where any one of the attacks was potentially fatal); , (defendant murdered two girls by asphyxiation but also mutilated their breasts and their genital areas); , (after strangling his victim, defendant carved the word “Bonzai” into the victim’s back
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
(offense heinous or depraved where defendant mutilated female murder victims’ breasts and sex organs).
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982