Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Smith, 599 P.2d 187.

70 citing documents.

State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith (Smith I), 123 Ariz. 231, 243, 2 ¶5 At resentencing, Smith’s counsel presented no new mitigation evidence and Smith was again sentenced to death.
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
(citing Murphy, 421 U.S. 794).
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994)
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 908 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 908 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
State v. Milke 865 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1993
-43 , -99 (1979) (affirming trial court’s refusal to find mitigating factor when the evidence was contradictory).
Carpenter v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Carpenter v. Superior Court 862 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(the state has a Rule 15.1 obligation in certain circumstances to disclose information not in its possession or under its control if the state has better access to the information).
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Gottsfield 829 P.2d 1241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Gottsfield 829 P.2d 1241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
In coming to this conclusion
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
We mention only two of the many cases in which a defendant pleaded guilty and received the death penalty:
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Acosta 801 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Acosta 801 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct.
Turbin v. Superior Court 797 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Turbin v. Superior Court 797 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
a deputy Maricopa County attorney had worked at the public defender’s office when that office represented the defendant on an unrelated criminal charge.
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
2031, 2036-38 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975)
State v. Brita 761 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1988
State v. Brita 761 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1988
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
We have held that the standard established by Rule 10.3 is commensurate with the constitutional standard, , namely whether the individual juror “can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court,” Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct.
State v. Brita 744 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Brita 744 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
167 , 70 L.Ed.2d 136 (1981)
State v. Dungan 718 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Dungan 718 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
The standard under which these motions are judged is commensurate with the constitutional standard, , that is, whether the individual “juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.” Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723 , 81 S.Ct.
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
Further, -38 , -94 (1979).
State v. Espinosa-Gamez 678 P.2d 1379 Ariz. 1984
State v. Espinosa-Gamez 678 P.2d 1379 Ariz. 1984
See State v. (Joseph Clarence) Smith
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
State v. Turney 655 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Turney 655 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. McVay 641 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1982
State v. McVay 641 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1982

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by