Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Bank of Arizona, 94 P.2d 437.

38 citing documents.

HSBC v. Cluff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
HSBC v. Cluff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-31 (1955) (explaining a recorded instrument is constructive notice only to those bound to search for it); see also Home Owners’ (explaining an allegation of negligence in drafting a deed is insufficient to defeat a reformation action because “[m]utual mistakes are always the result of some negligence .
California Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
California Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Krenz v. Medical Protective Co. of Fort Wayne, 57 Wis.2d 387 , 204 N.W.2d 663, 666 (1973); see also Home Owners’
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Gunther & Shirley Company, 5 Ariz.App.
Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc. 702 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc. 702 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Home Owners’ , Concannon, supra.
County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand Corporation 544 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1976
County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand Corporation 544 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1976
P.2d 856 (1953); Home Owners’
Shore Line Properties, Inc. v. Deer-O-Paints & Chemicals, Ltd. 538 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Shore Line Properties, Inc. v. Deer-O-Paints & Chemicals, Ltd. 538 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Home Owners’ , Johnson v. Hill, 1 Ariz.App.
Concannon v. Yewell 493 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Concannon v. Yewell 493 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Albert v. Joralemon, 271 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1959); , ; Home Owners’
Balon v. Hotel & Restaurant Supplies, Inc. 433 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Balon v. Hotel & Restaurant Supplies, Inc. 433 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Chantler v. Wood 430 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Chantler v. Wood 430 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Home Owners’ , 45 Am.Jur.
Johnson v. Hill 402 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Johnson v. Hill 402 P.2d 225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In the case of Home Owners’ Loan Corp. v. Bank of Arizona (1939), , , the court said: “The appellant complains of the court’s rulings on the admission of evidence over its objections, such objections being upon various grounds.
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
73 P. 399 ; , ; , ; American Eagle Fire Ins.
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
In the case of Home Owners’ -159 , , 442 we said: “The appellant complains of the court’s rulings on the admission of evidence over its objections, such objections being upon various grounds.
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Church 359 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1961
Parker v. State Ex Rel. Church 359 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1961
As stated in Home Owners’ , , 442: “ * * * we assume that if the court received improper evidence it did not consider it but considered only the competent evidence.
Odom v. First National Bank of Arizona 336 P.2d 141 Ariz. 1959
Odom v. First National Bank of Arizona 336 P.2d 141 Ariz. 1959
American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. Van Denburgh 257 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1953
American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. Van Denburgh 257 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1953
We may quickly dispose Of these assignments by quoting from a po.rtion of our holding in Home Owners’ , , 442: “ * * * We do not discuss these assignments for the reason that we as.sume that if the court received improper evidence it did not consider it but considered only the competent evidence.
Corn v. Branche 249 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1952
Corn v. Branche 249 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1952
Waugh v. Lennard 211 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1949
Waugh v. Lennard 211 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1949
Waiver is defined as a voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known right, Home Owners’ , ; In re Brandt’s Estate, , , whereas “estoppel” means that a party is precluded by his own acts from asserting a right to the detriment of another who, entitled to rely on such conduct, has acted thereon.
Anderson v. Alabam Freight Lines 169 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1946
Anderson v. Alabam Freight Lines 169 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1946
There is ample evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court, without consideration of any evidence which might have been erroneously admitted.” See also Home Owners’ , .
Collison v. International Insurance 118 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1941
Collison v. International Insurance 118 P.2d 445 Ariz. 1941

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by