Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mata, 609 P.2d 48.
-
State v. Morgan
625 P.2d 951
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
“To be constitutionally proscribed, a comment must be adverse; that is, it must support an unfavorable inference against the defendant and, therefore, operate as a penalty imposed for exercising a constitutional privilege.”
- State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
-
State v. Greenawalt
624 P.2d 828
Ariz. 1981
See State v. Watson, supra; , State v. Jordan, supra; State v. Steelman, supra; , , State v. Evans, supra.
- State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Clovis 618 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Clovis 618 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Jordan 614 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Jordan 614 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Ceja 612 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Ceja 612 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Mata 609 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Mata 609 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1980