Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Million, 583 P.2d 897.

69 citing documents.

  • State v. Hersch 662 P.2d 1035 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Hersch 662 P.2d 1035 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY 664 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY 664 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
    Since the defendant’s release from custody would follow, , and he has previously fled to Canada, the state’s fear that he will again flee is not groundless.
  • State v. Olson 654 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
  • State v. Olson 654 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
  • State v. MacK 654 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
  • State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • Distinguished State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    The Arizona cases, , , State v. Sardo, supra, and State v. Benge, supra, are distinguishable in that they involved vehicles stopped on the highway or while occupied by suspects, so that the possibility of the vehicle’s removal from the jurisdiction at the time of the
  • State v. Coury 625 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Coury 625 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
    Dismissal of a , for situations where the State desires to exercise its appeal rights from a suppression order under A.R.S.
  • State v. Eason 604 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
  • State v. Eason 604 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
  • State v. Kennedy 592 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Kennedy 592 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
    Had they done so, , by either dismissing the case in the trial court and proceeding with the appeal or showing us that it was one of the rare instances where a stay should be granted.
  • State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978