DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Denny, 579 P.2d 1101.

46 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel Ariz. 2026
  • State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    But, we are concerned with the prosecutor’s comments when they “suggest to the jury that defense counsel is being deceitful.”
  • State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    He asserts the court’s failure to include his requested instruction 5 constitutes reversible error.2 (remanding for new trial where trial court provided no jury instruction on state’s burden to disprove justification); P.2d 1224 (1977) (same).
  • State v. Valverde 204 P.3d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • Overruled State v. Valverde 204 P.3d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Hughes 969 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Hughes 969 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1998
  • State v. Dorman 805 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Dorman 805 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1991
    this court held that a trial court commits reversible error by refusing a defendant’s requested instruction that the state has the burden of proving that the defendant did not act in self-defense.
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Diaz 803 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Diaz 803 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Slemmer 802 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Slemmer 802 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
    Hunter was a rejection of the instruction and a , State v. Garcia, supra
  • State v. Ruelas 798 P.2d 1335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
    Hunter 142 Ariz. at 90 , 688 P.2d at 982
  • State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
    (defendant denied fair trial by interposing of over 850 objections plus over 200 other interruptions by the prosecutor during defendant’s cross-examination); , (prosecutor’s interruptions and objections during, closing argument did not result in an unfair trial under the circumstances).
  • State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
    ( , ); , (similar holding on justification instruction); Renforth, 155 Ariz. at 388 , 746 P.2d at 1318 (insanity defense).
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
    Once a defendant presents evidence sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to whether his conduct was justified, lack of justification becomes an element of the offense which the state must establish beyond a reasonable doubt, , , and the jury must be so instructed.
  • State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Hunter 688 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Hunter 688 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1984
    Everett, supra; -34 , -04 (1978).
  • State v. Williams 685 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Williams 685 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    Appellant suggests that proper instructions on the appellant’s burden of proof were necessary to prevent jury confusion and “burden-shifting.” , to support his argument that it is fundamental error to fail to inform the jury clearly on the defendant’s burden of proof on the issue of self-defense.
  • State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
    (“failure to object to a closing argument is a waiver of any right to review an appeal unless so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair trial.”) It is also apparent that any error was invited by defendant.
  • State v. Moya 672 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Moya 672 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Nelson 633 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Nelson 633 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Canedo 608 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Canedo 608 P.2d 774 Ariz. 1980
    however, we feel that this will no longer present an issue on retrial.
  • State v. Evans 608 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
  • State v. Evans 608 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
    In support of his argument that the trial court should have given a specific instruction that the state had to prove the lack of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt
  • State v. Contreras 595 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Contreras 595 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979