Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. LeMatty, 590 P.2d 449.
- State v. Graham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Graham
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 27.8(b)(3); (“The conclusion of the trial court will be upheld unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”) ().
- State v. Eaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Eaton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Oddo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Oddo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(noting a trial court’s finding of a probation violation will be upheld “unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence”) ( ).
- Calik v. Kongable 990 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1999
-
Calik v. Kongable
990 P.2d 1055
Ariz. 1999
Voters specifically rejected the legislature’s proposed changes ¶20 Courts should avoid “hyper-technical constructions that frustrate legislative intent.” , ( , ).
- State v. Cornish 968 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- State v. Cornish 968 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Saunders v. Board of Pardons & Paroles 847 P.2d 1124 Ariz. 1993
-
Saunders v. Board of Pardons & Paroles
847 P.2d 1124
Ariz. 1993
(“[A] practical construction is preferred to one which is absurd, and a practical construction is required if a technical construction would lead to mischief or absurdity.”).
- Goode v. Alfred 828 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
-
Goode v. Alfred
828 P.2d 1235
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
“A practical construction is preferred to one which is absurd, and a practical construction is required if a technical construction would lead to mischief or absurdity.”
- Perez v. Maricopa County 760 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Perez v. Maricopa County 760 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Weible 688 P.2d 1005 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Weible 688 P.2d 1005 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Alfaro 623 P.2d 8 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Alfaro
623 P.2d 8
Ariz. 1980
17 A.R.S., Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 27.7(b).
- State v. Watkins 611 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Watkins 611 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Moore 609 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Moore 609 P.2d 575 Ariz. 1980