Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pacheco, 588 P.2d 830.
- State v. Avila 170 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
State v. Avila
170 P.3d 706
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(holding a prior felony conviction may be established through a defendant’s admission during trial testimony that he “had a prior felony conviction for the same crime alleged, on the same date alleged, and at the same place alleged”).
- State v. Whitney 768 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Whitney
768 P.2d 638
Ariz. 1989
(accused’s admission while testifying may sufficiently establish the prior conviction); , (defendant’s admission on the stand of a prior conviction was sufficient proof of it)
- State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lucero 692 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Lucero
692 P.2d 287
Ariz. 1984
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); Schneckloth, supra
- State v. Hauss 681 P.2d 382 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Hauss
681 P.2d 382
Ariz. 1984
First, a former conviction may be sufficiently established by an accused’s admission of the conviction while testifying in court
- State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
- State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
- State v. McGann 645 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1982
- State v. McGann 645 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Dalglish 639 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1982
-
State v. Dalglish
639 P.2d 323
Ariz. 1982
We have also stated that “matters of judgment or tactics will not be reviewed in the harsh light of hindsight.”
- State v. Peyatt 637 P.2d 751 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
State v. Peyatt
637 P.2d 751
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
P.2d 830 (1978); State v. Phillips, 16 Ariz.App.
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 355 Ariz. 1981
-
State v. Tison
633 P.2d 355
Ariz. 1981
The burden of establishing the ineffectiveness of trial counsel is upon a claimant, , , and proof of ineffectiveness must be a demonstrable reality not merely a matter of speculation.
- State v. Salinas 631 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Salinas 631 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Mulalley 618 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Mulalley 618 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Austin 603 P.2d 502 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Austin 603 P.2d 502 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Dippre 592 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Dippre 592 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Salazar 595 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
State v. Salazar
595 P.2d 196
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
These standards were even more recently reiterated as Arizona’s