Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Patton, 586 P.2d 635.

94 citing documents.

State v. Williams 656 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Williams 656 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Gordon; , State v. Limpus.
State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. McGuire 638 P.2d 1339 Ariz. 1981
State v. McGuire 638 P.2d 1339 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vasquez 634 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vasquez 634 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mendibles 629 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Mendibles 629 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Bly 621 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1980
State v. Bly 621 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1980
State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
our Supreme Court discussed the role of appellate courts in sentence review cases: “A.R.S.
State v. Baker 617 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Baker 617 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Watkins 614 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1980
State v. Watkins 614 P.2d 835 Ariz. 1980
State v. La Mountain 611 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1980
State v. La Mountain 611 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gordon 610 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gordon 610 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1980
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
State v. Scrivner 611 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Scrivner 611 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Jones 601 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jones 601 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1979
The Court of Appeals, in Catalan , , stating: “ , we have the reverse of the situation here.
State v. Herrera 599 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1979
State v. Herrera 599 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1979
State v. Toulouse 594 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1979
State v. Toulouse 594 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1979
State v. Catalan 593 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Catalan 593 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
we have the reverse of the situation here.
State v. Ethington 592 P.2d 768 Ariz. 1979
State v. Ethington 592 P.2d 768 Ariz. 1979
P.2d 622 , cert, denied, 363 U.S. 815 , 80 S.Ct.
State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
State v. Herrera 588 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1978
State v. Herrera 588 P.2d 305 Ariz. 1978
State v. Montano 589 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Montano 589 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
The transcript of sentencing reflects that the court felt that the only way appellant could be taught a lesson and be made to realize that he had to take some responsibility for things that happened was to give him “some time in prison.” In its recent decision in State v. Patton, Ariz., the Supreme Court reviewed in detail the various factors to be considered by the trial court in the exercise of its discretion as to sentence.