Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Rose, 589 P.2d 5.

122 citing documents.

State v. Huey 699 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1985
State v. Paxton 701 P.2d 1204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Paxton 701 P.2d 1204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Frustino 689 P.2d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Frustino 689 P.2d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
State v. Cruz 672 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1983
Such evidence is admissible to show the defendant's *546 plan, , , or to show the complete story of the crime.
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Montano 667 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1983
State v. Montano 667 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1983
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Davis 672 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
State v. Featherman 651 P.2d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Featherman 651 P.2d 868 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
However, the relevance of a prior bad act may outweigh the prejudice to the defendant “if the illegal conduct does more than discredit the character of the defendant.”
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
State v. San Miguel 643 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. San Miguel 643 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
accord, Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469 , 69 S.Ct.
State v. Hines 633 P.2d 1384 Ariz. 1981
State v. Hines 633 P.2d 1384 Ariz. 1981
As a general rule, evidence of other crimes is not admissible to show that the defendant is a bad person or has a
State v. Miller 632 P.2d 552 Ariz. 1981
State v. Miller 632 P.2d 552 Ariz. 1981
Evidence of prior bad acts is usually inadmissible
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Morgan 625 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Morgan 625 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
rule 8.2(c), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
Appellant’s other motions are governed by the same standard; for abuse of discretion with resulting prejudice, see State v. Schmid, supra (change of venue); , (change of venue); , (scope of voir dire); , (extent of voir dire); Rule 18.5, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Barnett 617 P.2d 1132 Ariz. 1980
State v. Barnett 617 P.2d 1132 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
State v. Gordon 610 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1980