Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lujan, 604 P.2d 629.

78 citing documents.

State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Guzman-Leal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(stating that, when the requested instruction was not made part of the record, the appellate court is not able to rule as a matter of law whether the instruction should have been given or whether it was substantially covered by the other instructions given by the court to the jury).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
To justify a flight instruction, the “manner of leaving the scene of the crime must reveal consciousness of guilt,” because “merely leaving the scene of a crime is not evidence of flight.”
State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Satovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“[M]erely leaving the scene of a crime is not evidence of flight.”
State v. Geeslin 225 P.3d 1129 Ariz. 2010
State v. Geeslin 225 P.3d 1129 Ariz. 2010
at 513, 658 P.2d at 166; (refusing to “speculate as to [the] exact content” of a requested instruction not in the record).
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Speers 98 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(running from scene and discarding shoes); , (running from the scene of a crime); , (attempting to elude police in a high speed chase); , (taking the '“back roads” to leave country and concealing iden
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Cutright 2 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
(running from the scene of a crime); , (attempting to elude police in a high speed chase); , (escape following arrest).
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
State v. Smith 974 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1999
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1997
In State v. Lujan, we found that the following factors existed but did not indicate that the killing was accomplished in an especially heinous or depraved manner: “the helplessness of the victim; the lack of necessity for the killing to accomplish the defendant’s plan to steal; and the magnitude of the wound inflicted demonstrating a clear intent to kill.”
State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
State v. Mata 916 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1996
796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980); , ).
State v. Wilson 914 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Wilson 914 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
See Gretzler, 135 Ariz. at 52-53 , 659 P.2d at 11-12 , , (unconscious victim was helpless but murder not heinous or depraved), , (unnecessary killing of robbery victim and bystander not heinous or depraved).
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
(flight instruction proper where defendant and accomplices ran away from the scene of a stabbing immediately after it occurred even though not being pursued by law enforcement officials).
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
This court stated, “We do not, in this case, find the killing to be set apart from the normal first degree murder.” -73 , -37 (1979).
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
213 , 66 L.Ed.2d 93 (1980)
State v. Holder 745 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Holder 745 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
250 , we think it would be unfair to suggest that any attorney, or a defendant representing himself, should have been aware of the grounds for objecting to the exercise of peremptory challenges to exclude members of a minority race from a -37 , 698 P.2d *82 1244, 1254-56 (1985)
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
2259 , 72 L.Ed.2d 863 (1982)
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
in a wanton, insensate or vindicative manner: sadistic.” , quoting Webster’s Third New International Dictionary.
State v. Noleen 688 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1984
State v. Noleen 688 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1984
(defendant’s manner of leaving the scene may manifest guilt).
State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
(victim’s death not committed in heinous, cruel or depraved manner, so no aggravating circumstance found); , (death penalty reduced to life imprisonment due to mitigating circumstance).
State v. Bernal 671 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1983
State v. Bernal 671 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1983
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler, supra
State v. Hunter 664 P.2d 195 Ariz. 1983
State v. Hunter 664 P.2d 195 Ariz. 1983