Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Smith, 610 P.2d 46.

45 citing documents.

John Fitzgerald v. Hon. myers/state Ex Rel Brnovich Ariz. 2017
John Fitzgerald v. Hon. myers/state Ex Rel Brnovich Ariz. 2017
–64 (1983); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
2670 , 81 L.Ed.2d 375 (1984)
State v. Ikirt 770 P.2d 1159 Ariz. 1989
State v. Ikirt 770 P.2d 1159 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
“[f]acts which would tend to show mitigation are peculiarly within the knowledge of a defendant.” , , cert.
State v. Stevens 764 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 748 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 748 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1987
The conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
2670 , 81 L.Ed.2d 375 (1984)
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
We have previously held that “[t]he burden of mitigation has consistently been placed on the defendant, ...” , (citations omitted).
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
This argument was discussed and *569
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
31.13(c)(1)(iv) provides that the opening brief in a criminal appeal should include “[a] concise argument containing the contentions of the party, the reasons therefor, and necessary supporting citations.” Failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment, , , and waiver thereof.
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Richmond, supra, 136 Ariz. at 316 , 666 P.2d at 61
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
“[fjacts which would tend to show mitigation are peculiarly within the knowledge of a defendant.” Third, appellant claims he was denied his right to be sentenced by an impartial trier of fact.
State v. Van Alcorn 665 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Van Alcorn 665 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Rule 31.13(c)(l)(iv), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., requires that the appellant’s brief shall contain: “A concise argument containing the contentions of the party, the reasons therefor, and necessary supporting citations.”
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
State v. Blazak 643 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
State v. Blazak 643 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
State v. Greenawalt, supra.
State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981
408 , 66 L.Ed.2d 251 (1980)
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
287 , 66 L.Ed.2d 141 (1980); State v. Jordan, supra; , ; State v. Watson, supra.
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Robertson 624 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Robertson 624 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980