Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jarzab, 599 P.2d 761.

55 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
should satisfy [themselves] as to the innocence of the activity by all reasonable, lawful means’ ”)
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 280 P.3d 1239 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores 280 P.3d 1239 Ariz. 2012
Terry stop, we examine “(1) whether the facts warranted the intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment rights, and (2) whether the scope of the intrusion was reasonably related to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” State v. Jarzab, 123 Ariz. 308, 310, (internal citation omitted); see Terry, 392 U.S. at 20.
Maretick v. Jarrett 62 P.3d 120 Ariz. 2003
Maretick v. Jarrett 62 P.3d 120 Ariz. 2003
disapproved on other grounds
State v. Dean 55 P.3d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Dean 55 P.3d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
an abuse of discretion.’” , *411 421, ¶ 7, ( , ).
State v. Lopez 10 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Lopez 10 P.3d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
an abuse of discretion.”
State v. O'MEARA 4 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. O'MEARA 4 P.3d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
¶ 13 Finally, appellant argues that the duration of his detention while awaiting the dog’s arrival was unreasonable, P.2d 1304 (1997)
State v. Richcreek 930 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1997
State v. Richcreek 930 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1997
See United States v. Rodriguez, 976 F.2d 592, 594 (9th Cir.1992), modified, 997 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir.1993)
State v. Richcreek 924 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Richcreek 924 P.2d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
our Supreme Court pointedly held that “an officer, when he commences an investigation, need [not] be convinced that ‘criminal activity is afoot.’ ” The officer had reasonable cause to detain Richcreek for investigation based on the near-stop of his vehicle at the scene of the accident
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT30243 920 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT30243 920 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Romero 870 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Romero 870 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
1921, 1923 , 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972), , cert.
State v. Serna 860 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Serna 860 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Tykwinski 824 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Tykwinski 824 P.2d 761 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Garcia-Garcia 821 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Garcia-Garcia 821 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Vasquez 796 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Vasquez 796 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Stabler 783 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Stabler 783 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
1427 , 39 L.Ed.2d 479 ; , cert.
State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Palmer 751 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Palmer 751 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
overruled on other grounds
State v. Clevidence 736 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Clevidence 736 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Fimbres 733 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Fimbres 733 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
n. # 1, n. 1 (1976), overruled on other grounds, , purports to define evidence as including argument or legal theory.
State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-55 , -89 (1976) disapproved of on other grounds
State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
3091, 3095 (U.S. 16 Jan.1985); , cert.
State v. Collins 679 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Collins 679 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Curiel 634 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Curiel 634 P.2d 988 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975); , cert, denied 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Master 619 P.2d 482 Ariz. 1980
State v. Master 619 P.2d 482 Ariz. 1980
Like all warrantless intrusions on interest protected by the fourth amendment, the validity of the brief investigative stop recognized in Terry v. Ohio, supra, , turns on the reasonableness of the officer’s actions under the circumstances.
State v. Brooks 618 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980