DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Christensen, 628 P.2d 580.

121 citing documents.

  • State v. Stanhope 676 P.2d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Stanhope 676 P.2d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Kerekes 673 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Kerekes 673 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Garcia 673 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Garcia 673 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
    the court stated: “A mistrial is a serious remedy.
  • State v. Hallman 668 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Hallman 668 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
    See , (aggression and association with violent persons as indicative of an aggressive and violent character); , (acting impulsively is a character trait); , (veracity is a trait of character).
  • State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
    (expert may not testify that defendant was not acting reflectively at the time of the crime); , (expert may not testify that at the time of the crime defendant lacked ability to form specific intent)
  • State v. Chapple 660 P.2d 1208 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Chapple 660 P.2d 1208 Ariz. 1983
    where photographs were not shocking and were probative of contested issues.
  • State v. Ramos 648 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Ramos 648 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Collins 648 P.2d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
  • State v. Collins 648 P.2d 135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
    our supreme court held that this constitutional right to be present applies “whenever the presence has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend.” (quoting Snyder v. Massachusetts, infra) Other state courts have considered this question.
  • State v. Ramos 648 P.2d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981