DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vickers, 633 P.2d 315.

98 citing documents.

  • State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
    1 , , (the right to object to testimony which violates the right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution can be waived by failure to object.)
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
    We have considered cases involving multiple aggravating circumstances and no mitigating circumstances justifying leniency; see, , , , , cases where mitigating circumstances included an unpleasant childhood, see, e.g., State v. Gretzler, supra; State v. Clark, supra; and cases where mitigating circumstances included the defendant’s age, see
  • State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
    Although we have previ *50 ously stated that such detailed findings are neither required nor necessary, , we believe that the better practice is for the trial court to place, on the record, a list of all factors offered by a defendant in mitigation and then explain his reasons for accepting or rejecting them.
  • State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
    Defendant argues that, , he was entitled to a lesser included offense instruction.
  • State v. Hutton 694 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Hutton 694 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1985
    -22 (1981); Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Vickers 675 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Vickers 675 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Radjenovich 674 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Radjenovich 674 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
    face and buried body in a shallow grave); State v. Woratzeck, supra (defendant strangled the victim, stabbed her three times in the chest, and struck her twice on the head, where any one of the attacks was potentially fatal); , (defendant murdered two girls by asphyxiation but also mutilated their breasts and their genital areas); , (after strangling his victim, defendant carved the word “Bonzai” into the victim’s back); , (defendant repeatedly shot and kicked his victims after they were unconsc
  • State v. Berndt 672 P.2d 1311 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Berndt 672 P.2d 1311 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
    citing to Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. McMurtrey 664 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1983
    the Court explained how a sentencing judge is to consider evidence offered to establish the mitigating circumstance in § 13-703(G)(1) in order to comply with State v. Richmond, supra, as well as Lockett v. Ohio, supra, and State v. Watson, supra.
  • State v. Chapple 660 P.2d 1208 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Chapple 660 P.2d 1208 Ariz. 1983
    where photographs were not shocking and were probative of contested issues.
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
    This state has learned through sad experience that even after incarceration a violent person may become a menace to other prisoners, , (prison inmate committed violent strangulation and stabbing murder of another prisoner; he later killed yet another prisoner by burning him to death, see No. 5698, State v. Vickers), or may escape and become a menace to the public at large
  • State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
    1492 , 71 L.Ed.2d 693 (1982); , , , cert.
  • State v. Dalglish 639 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Dalglish 639 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Smith 638 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Smith 638 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1981
    2988 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1977)
  • State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
  • Arizona State Land Dept. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 633 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1981