DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Caudillo, 604 P.2d 1121.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
  • State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
    However, we held “whether the penalty is less or the same, an offense is [a lesser] included [offense] if all the elements thereof are contained within the elements necessary to prove the offense charged.” Id.
  • State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    State v. Caudillo , , 412, , 1122 (1979) (citations omitted).
  • State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
  • State of Arizona v. Luis Enrique Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
    out having committed the lesser one.’”), (“An offense is ‘lesser included’ when the ‘greater offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing the lesser offense.’”), (test to determine if offense 23 is lesser included is whether the greater offense could not have been committed without necessarily committing the lesser); -57 (as charged
  • State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
  • State v. Magana 874 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Woods 815 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Woods 815 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Flores 682 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Flores 682 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juv.
  • State v. Diaz 662 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Diaz 662 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    State v. Jackson, supra; , , 41 Am.Jur.2d Indictments and Informations, Sec.
  • State v. Wise 671 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Wise 671 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    Although the terms of the charging document in the present case describe conduct which is prohibited by the sexual abuse statute, our supreme court has stated that, to be entitled to a lesser included offense instruction, “the offense charged must contain all the elements of the included offense plus at least one additional element.”
  • State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981