Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Shreeve v. Greer, 173 P.2d 641.
-
Young v. Bishop
353 P.2d 1017
Ariz. 1960
ned escrow agreement in the case at bar, with reference to its status as a memorandum of an alleged agreement to buy and sell, we see defendant as seller; Norell on behalf of plaintiffs, as the person with whom defendant negotiated as buyer, the missing signatures of plaintiffs on the escrow agreement not being defective in this action since defendant is the party to be charged, , , the total sales price is specified, as are the terms of payment and interest, and the date after which the payment
- Lee v. Nichols 301 P.2d 1022 Ariz. 1956
- Lee v. Nichols 301 P.2d 1022 Ariz. 1956
- Durham v. Dodd 285 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1955
-
Durham v. Dodd
285 P.2d 747
Ariz. 1955
we quoted with approval the Restatement of the Law, Contracts, section 207, which prescribes the test to determine the adequacy of a memorandum to make enforceable a contract under the Statute of Frauds.
- Morgan v. Bruce 259 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1953
- Morgan v. Bruce 259 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1953
- Magma Copper Co. v. Aldrete 216 P.2d 392 Ariz. 1950
-
Magma Copper Co. v. Aldrete
216 P.2d 392
Ariz. 1950
1271 , 1279; 12 Am.Jur., Contracts, section 277; , , citing Arizona cases.
- Robinson v. Merchants Packing Co. 182 P.2d 97 Ariz. 1947
-
Robinson v. Merchants Packing Co.
182 P.2d 97
Ariz. 1947
As to the 4th Assignment of Error plaintiffs contend that: “ * * * since the lease was signed for the benefit of a third party (Mrs. Robinson), that she can sue under the terms of the lease for back rent and damages for breach of the lease.” , , as follows: “Appellant insists that there was a lack of mutuality both as to obligation and remedy for the reason that Byron Heap, only, signed the agreement.