Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. v. Employment Security Commission, 182 P.2d 83.

29 citing documents.

Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (discussing the Employment Security Act’s remedial purpose and stating “that devices of every kind to defeat it are to be frowned upon and stricken down”).
Dioguardi v. Superior Court 909 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Dioguardi v. Superior Court 909 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Rice v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 901 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rice v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 901 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Comm’n, , see also Munguia, 159 Ariz. at 161-62 , 765 P.2d at 563-64 .
Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 897 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Maldonado v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 897 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Munguia v. Department of Economic Security 765 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Munguia v. Department of Economic Security 765 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Comm’n, , see also DES v. Little, 24 Ariz.App.
At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 741 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 741 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. v. King 593 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1979
ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. v. King 593 P.2d 908 Ariz. 1979
Dearing v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 589 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Dearing v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 589 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
See Beaman v. Superior Products, Inc.
Arizona College of the Bible, Inc. v. Department of Economic Security 582 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Arizona College of the Bible, Inc. v. Department of Economic Security 582 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Commission, , Arizona Dept. of Economic Security v. Little, 24 Ariz.App.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Service 560 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1977
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Service 560 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1977
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Little, 24 Ariz.App.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Little 539 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Little 539 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
the court stated: “In coming to any answer it has been remembered that the statute is remedial; that it enunciates and is addressed to a public policy; that it is ameliatory of the evils resulting from lack of employment; that it is to be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose; that device
Brobston v. Employment Security Commission 385 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1963
Beaman v. Superior Products, Inc. 358 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1961
Beaman v. Superior Products, Inc. 358 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1961
we said: “ * * * it has been [sic] remembered that the statute is remedial; that it enunciates and is addressed to a public policy; that it is ameliatory of the evils resulting from lack of employment; that it is to be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose; that devices of every kind to
McClain v. Church 236 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1951
McClain v. Church 236 P.2d 44 Ariz. 1951
d 760 , ; Curtis v. Riley, 22 Wash.2d 951 , ; Coppage v. Riley, 22 Wash.2d 802 , ; (b) two federal cases, viz.: Henry Broderick, Inc., v. Squire, 9 Cir., 163 F.2d 980 ; Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 8 Cir., 179 F.2d 882 ; (c) , .
Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert 181 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1947
Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert 181 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1947