DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ellerson, 609 P.2d 64.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Woratzeck 637 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Woratzeck 637 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Aguirre 633 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Aguirre 633 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    (held that although the court made no express findings, its actions and the record indicated that the court had considered the necessary factors).
  • State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
    More recently we have held that the “better procedure would be for the court before evidence of a prior criminal conviction is admitted for impeachment purposes, to make an on-the-record finding based on specific facts and circumstances that the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice (citation omitted).”
  • State v. Wilson 626 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Wilson 626 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Noble 612 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Noble 612 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1980
    After the instant decision of the Court of Appeals, this court, , held that the defendant did not waive the right to object to the ruling of the trial court by “drawing the sting” during the time of trial.
  • State v. Pickett 613 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Pickett 613 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
    our Supreme Court stated: “It is true that the record does not affirmatively show that the court in denying the motion in limine as to the burglary convictions made the findings required by Rule 609(a).
  • State v. McClellan 611 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. McClellan 611 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Ethridge 612 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Ethridge 612 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980