Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial Commission, 173 P.2d 84.
- Labor Force v. Industrial Commission 911 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Labor Force v. Industrial Commission
911 P.2d 553
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
See e.g., West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, -90 , -89 (1946).
- State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp. 752 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp.
752 P.2d 1
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
This requires coverage for “all employees in the particular business or occupation of the employer who under the law are entitled to compensation____” West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial Comm’n
- Still v. Industrial Commission 706 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Still v. Industrial Commission 706 P.2d 759 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Nochta v. Industrial Commission 436 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
-
Nochta v. Industrial Commission
436 P.2d 944
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
We think it had this right.”
- Williams v. Williams Insulation Materials, Inc. 370 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1962
- Williams v. Williams Insulation Materials, Inc. 370 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1962
- Helmericks v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Ariz. 357 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1960
- Helmericks v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Ariz. 357 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1960
- Revles v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 352 P.2d 759 Ariz. 1960
- Knight v. Rice 321 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1958
- Knight v. Rice 321 P.2d 1037 Ariz. 1958
- Bradshaw v. Industrial Commission 276 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1954
- Bradshaw v. Industrial Commission 276 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1954
- Jenkins v. Industrial Commission 272 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1954
- Stanley v. Industrial Commission 251 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1952
- Stanley v. Industrial Commission 251 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1952
- Cooper v. Industrial Commission 249 P.2d 142 Ariz. 1952
-
Cooper v. Industrial Commission
249 P.2d 142
Ariz. 1952
The question of three or more employees has been decided by this court in the matter of Killebrew v. Industrial Commission, 1947, , , and the question of insuring all employees of a specific employer has been covered in detail in the case of West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial Commission, 1946, , .
- Carnes v. Industrial Commission 240 P.2d 536 Ariz. 1952
-
Carnes v. Industrial Commission
240 P.2d 536
Ariz. 1952
90: “It must be borne in mind that this is a proceeding instituted on behalf of the applicant Webb for compensation.
- Industrial Commission of Arizona v. J. & J. CONST. CO. 231 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1951
- Industrial Commission of Arizona v. J. & J. CONST. CO. 231 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1951
- Lee v. Industrial Commission 224 P.2d 1085 Ariz. 1950
- Lee v. Industrial Commission 224 P.2d 1085 Ariz. 1950
- Haggard v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1950
- Haggard v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1950
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Hadley 218 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1950
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Hadley 218 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1950
- O'Neill v. Martori 212 P.2d 994 Ariz. 1949
-
O'Neill v. Martori
212 P.2d 994
Ariz. 1949
the court said : “ * * * The fact that the petitioner employer failed to pay premiums on com *277 pensation of Trout and his employees does not legally prejudice the commission.
- Madrigal v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1949
- Madrigal v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1949
- Emery v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1949
- Emery v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1949
- Weaver v. Martori 208 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1949
-
Weaver v. Martori
208 P.2d 652
Ariz. 1949
it was stated: “Estoppel operates to prohibit a party from changing his position only when the party asserting estoppel has been led to change his position for the worse.” (Emphasis supplied.)
- Blasdell v. Industrial Commission 181 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1947
- Blasdell v. Industrial Commission 181 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1947