Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. Wright, 166 P.2d 943.

40 citing documents.

Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant 437 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2019
City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant 437 P.3d 865 Ariz. 2019
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
for example, the court held the Commission has “no implied powers and its powers do not exceed those to be derived from a strict construction of the Constitution and implementing statutes.” Two years later, though, the court ruled that the Commission’s powers are not limited to prescri
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 12 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 12 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Tonto Creek, 177 Ariz. at 55 , 864 P.2d at 1087 .
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
this court stated that the Commission has “no implied powers and its powers do not exceed those to be derived from a strict construction of the Constitution and implementing statutes.” 7 Arizona’s “Blue Sky” statute therefore did not grant the Commission power to revoke a permit for sa
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
Smith v. Payne 753 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1988
this court upheld the validity of an insurance company’s plan to sell its stock in accordance with a certain trust agreement.
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 746 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 746 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Ayala v. Hill 664 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Ayala v. Hill 664 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
229 P. 99 (1924); , 188 P. 271 (1920); , 127 P. 727 (1912).
Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff Dairy 570 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Valley Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Flagstaff Dairy 570 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Herzberg v. David 555 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima 439 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1968
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima 439 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1968
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Byrne 419 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1966
Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Byrne 419 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1966
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Matthews, 77 Nev.
Williams v. Pipe Trades Industry Program of Arizona 409 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1966
Williams v. Pipe Trades Industry Program of Arizona 409 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1966
Kendall v. Malcolm 404 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1965
Kendall v. Malcolm 404 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1965
Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'N 404 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1965
Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'N 404 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1965
Rubens v. Costello 251 P.2d 306 Ariz. 1952
Rubens v. Costello 251 P.2d 306 Ariz. 1952
wherein the pertinent sections are fully set out, we had occasion to construe the meaning of these articles and to point out the distinction between an “investment company” and a “dealer”.
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
Metropolitan Lines, Inc. v. Brooks 220 P.2d 480 Ariz. 1950
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ralston 196 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1948
Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ralston 196 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1948
we said: “The Corporation Commission has no implied powers and its powers do not exceed those to be derived from a strict construction of the Constitution and implementing statutes.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by