Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Davis v. Kleindienst, 169 P.2d 78.

65 citing documents.

National Tax v. Rivers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Title Co. v. Action Acquisitions, L.L.C., ¶ 12 (2008), ).
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Delo v. Gmac Mortgage, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A. 302 P.3d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Delo v. Gmac Mortgage, LLC, U.S. Bank, N.A. 302 P.3d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Title Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See generally Warren v. Whitehall Income Fund 86, , (stating that a purchaser with constructive notice of a prior claim on property "is not a bona fide purchaser”); -59 , (requiring a buyer of property put on inquiry notice to exercise due diligence in order to qualify for status as a bona fide purchaser); , (same); Restatement (First) of Restitution § 175(1) (19
LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges 232 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges 232 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLC, , , Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc.
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLC 187 P.3d 1107 Ariz. 2008
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
& Loan Ass’n v. Sundell, 11 Ariz. *639 App. 372, 374 , vacated on other grounds
Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc. 798 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc. 798 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
6A Powell, Real Property § 904(2)(b) (1988); -58 , -83 (1946).
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd. 688 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd. 688 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
U.S. Fiduciary Corp. v. Loma Vista Associates 675 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
U.S. Fiduciary Corp. v. Loma Vista Associates 675 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Failure to exercise such due diligence results in a lack of bona fide purchaser status
Van Dever v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 629 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Van Dever v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 629 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Ballard v. Lawyers Title of Arizona 552 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ballard v. Lawyers Title of Arizona 552 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Leahy v. Ryan, 20 Ariz.App.
Neal v. Hunt 541 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1975
Neal v. Hunt 541 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1975
City of Scottsdale v. Burke 504 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
City of Scottsdale v. Burke 504 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
208 P. 1024 (1922); Northwestern Nat.
Howell v. Remme 480 P.2d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Howell v. Remme 480 P.2d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co., 10 Ariz.App.
Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sundell 472 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1970
Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sundell 472 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1970
83 we said: "The law seems to be settled that a person who fails to exercise due diligence to avail himself of information which is within his reach, is not a bona fide purchaser * * *.
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co. 457 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co. 457 P.2d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Longshaw v. Corbitt, 4 Ariz.App.
Chantler v. Wood 430 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Chantler v. Wood 430 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Home Owners’ , 45 Am.Jur.
MacEwen v. Peterson 427 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1967
MacEwen v. Peterson 427 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1967
§ 33-411) ; but if there is any reasonable evidence to justify the court’s findings that the defendant purchased with notice, or was not a purchaser for value, the judgment must be affirmed, , .
Longshaw v. Corbitt 420 P.2d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Longshaw v. Corbitt 420 P.2d 980 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Godfrey v. Navratil 411 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Godfrey v. Navratil 411 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
ice of a fact affecting property which he seeks to purchase, which puts him upon inquiry, he is chargeable with the knowledge ■which the inquiry, if made, would have revealed; and one is put upon inquiry by notice of a claim which is inconsistent with the title he seeks to obtain, and must exercise due diligence to ascertain the facts upon which the claim is based.” Also, , : “The law seems to be settled that a person who fails to exercise due diligence to avail himself of information which is w
Lujan v. MacMurtrie 383 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1963