Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Schad, 633 P.2d 366.

88 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Edward Littleton McCauley Ariz. 2026
See Bush, 244 Ariz. at 585 ¶ 36; Lynch I, 225 Ariz. at 36 ¶ 37; –68 (1981); Melendez, 121 Ariz. at 3.
State v. Stoneham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Stoneham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
State v. Cruz 181 P.3d 196 Ariz. 2008
P. 19.4; we will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on sequestration absent “an abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice to the defendant.” Murray, 184 Ariz. at 33, 906 P.2d at 566 ( ).
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Cañez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Canez 42 P.3d 564 Ariz. 2002
State v. Flores 986 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Flores 986 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See, , Castaneda, 150 Ariz. at 389 , 724 P.2d at 8 ; -10 , -90 (1984); Girdler, 138 Ariz. at 485-86 , 675 P.2d at 1304-05 ; -01 , -16 (1982); , cert.
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Dunlap 930 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
933, 938-39 , 122 L.Ed.2d 317 (1993); , , cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
And, as we have repeatedly stated, “there is no presumption that jurors will disobey instructions given them by the court.” , , 377 (1981)
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
Defendant lists as two other issues "independent review” and "proportionality reviews.” We *438 automatically conduct an independent review of the record, , cert.
State v. Larriva 870 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
We have held that “[t]he giving of a felony-murder instruction is a mitigating circumstance only where there is some *649 doubt as to defendant’s specific intent to kill the victim.” Gillies I, 135 Ariz. at 513, 662 P.2d at 1020 (emphasis added), -74 , -83 (1981).
State v. Paredes 810 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Paredes 810 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
3097 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1356 (1983); , (state’s burden of proof for aggravating circumstances constitutional), cert.
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
3097 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1356 (1983); , (State’s burden of proof for aggravating circumstances constitutional), cert.
State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
We will uphold the verdict below if “there exists substantial evidence from the entire record from which a rational trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” , cert.
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
We will uphold the verdict below if “there exists substantial evidence from the entire record from which a rational trier of fact could have found the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” , cert.
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Charo 754 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1988
State v. Charo 754 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1988
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Jensen 735 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1987
State v. Jensen 735 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1987
1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); , cert.
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Blazak, supra; , , cert.
State v. Schad 691 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1984
State v. Schad 691 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1984
State v. Schad, Jr., , cert.