DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Laffoon, 610 P.2d 1045.

68 citing documents.

  • State v. Rineer 639 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Betancourt 638 P.2d 728 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Betancourt 638 P.2d 728 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Embree 633 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Embree 633 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Christensen 628 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Christensen 628 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
    the Arizona Supreme Court stated: “The elements of the crime as prescribed in the statute determine whether a crime is a lesser included offense of a greater offense, not the facts of a given case.” 125 Ariz. at 487, 610 P.2d at 1048 .
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Robertson 624 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Robertson 624 P.2d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
    P.2d 1045 (1980), the court stated: “The test of a lesser included offense is whether the first (greater) offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing the second (lesser) offense.
  • State v. Tresize 623 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Tresize 623 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1980
    The standard applicable to the granting of a , -47 (1980): “A.motion to continue will be granted upon a ‘showing that extraordinary circumstances exist and that delay is indis-pensible to the interests of justice.’ .