Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Watkins, 611 P.2d 923.

30 citing documents.

State v. Turay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Turay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Andrich v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrich v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona 155 P.3d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona 155 P.3d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(even if presiding judge “was personally disqualified, he had no duty to recuse himself from selecting the judge to hear this [capital] case”); (presiding criminal judge, previously removed from case for cause, not disqualified from “performing mere ministerial act[]” of later “assigning the case to an impartial tribunal”).
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Villalpando v. Reagan 121 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
in which the court rejected the argument that a disqualified presiding judge was also disqualified from reassigning the case.
In Re Richard M. 993 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
In Re Richard M. 993 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
that it was proper for a presiding judge, who was himself successfully challenged for cause, to reassign the case to another judge.
State v. Robinson 869 P.2d 1196 Ariz. 1994
State v. Robinson 869 P.2d 1196 Ariz. 1994
State v. Heasley, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Robinson 864 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Robinson 864 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Heasley, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
*327 , we addressed a presiding judge’s responsibilities to assign cases.
State v. Jones 788 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Jones 788 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Heasley, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
(defendant’s signature under phrase “ * * * acknowledge receipt of a copy of this document” sufficient proof defendant in fact received document).
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Gessner 626 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Gessner 626 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981