Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anderson v. Artesia Inv. Co., 188 P.2d 455.

26 citing documents.

Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co., (citations omitted); (“[T]he trial court, sitting without a jury, is judge of the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.”) ().
Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals 599 P.2d 227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals 599 P.2d 227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
.” In our review of the facts, heretofore, we find that there is conflict in the evidence as to what the parties thought a “ten per cent participation a
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 456 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 456 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
.” Of course there are situations where we will not accept the findings of the trier of fact, such as where the record contains no evidence to support s
Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Narramore 378 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Narramore 378 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
Co., , ; , that: “ * * * In considering questions of this nature we have repeatedly laid down the following rules, that where the evidence is in conflict, we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court (citing cases)
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Co., , , 457 set forth the governing principles.
Lieberman v. Brittain Hendrickson Mining Co. 367 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1961
Lieberman v. Brittain Hendrickson Mining Co. 367 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1961
Co., , ) the facts are as follows.
Patzman v. Marshall 363 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1961
Patzman v. Marshall 363 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1961
Daru v. Martin, 89 Ariz. -, 363 P.2d.
Church v. Meredith 321 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1958
Church v. Meredith 321 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1958
Eldridge v. Jagger 317 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1957
Eldridge v. Jagger 317 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1957
Co., , , that where the evidence is in conflict we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court; *153 the evidence will be taken in the strongest manner in favor of the appellee and in support of the court’s finding; and the judgment will not be disturbed when there is any reasonable evi
Sturges v. Tongeland 317 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1957
Sturges v. Tongeland 317 P.2d 941 Ariz. 1957
Co., , at page 338, , at page 457, Judge Johnson, in speaking for the court, set forth the governing principles.
MacDonald v. Cluff 206 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1949
MacDonald v. Cluff 206 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1949
Gillespie Land & , ; , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by