Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re McDonnell's Estate, 179 P.2d 238.

64 citing documents.

  • Honk v. Karlsson 292 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1956
  • Honk v. Karlsson 292 P.2d 455 Ariz. 1956
    * * * ” The test applicable to the sufficiency of evidence to establish fraud was further delineated in the case of In re McDonnell’s Estate, , , to wit: “Fraud may never be established by doubtful, vague, speculative, or inconclusive evidence, and always the proof must be sufficient to overcome the initial presumption in favor of honesty.
  • Lane v. Mathews 245 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1952
  • Lane v. Mathews 245 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1952
    t, either that (1) lessors were inexcusably negligent in failing to reread the lease before signing it; (2) that there was no inequitable conduct on the part of the lessee in not advising lessors of the changes, or (3) that there was negligence on the part of lessors and inequitable conduct on the part of lessee; but applying *206 the rule as enunciated in In re McDonnell’s Estate, , , that where there is a clear showing of fraud on the one hand and gross negligence upon the other, and the right
  • Funk v. Spalding 246 P.2d 184 Ariz. 1952
  • Funk v. Spalding 246 P.2d 184 Ariz. 1952
    In re McDonnell’s Estate, , .
  • Leigh v. Swartz 245 P.2d 262 Ariz. 1952
  • Leigh v. Swartz 245 P.2d 262 Ariz. 1952
    They cite and rely upon the following quotation from In re McDonnell’s Estate, , , that a mere friendly relation is insufficient upon which to base a confidential relation: “ * * * a confidential relation * * * is a relation of parties in which one is bound to act for the benefit of the other and can take no advantage to himself from his acts relating to the interest of the other * * * it is denie
  • Brazee v. Morris 204 P.2d 475 Ariz. 1949
  • Brazee v. Morris 204 P.2d 475 Ariz. 1949
    In re McDonnell’s Estate, supra [ , ] * * , .
  • Morrison v. Acton 198 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1948
  • Morrison v. Acton 198 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1948
    Gillespie Land & , ; In Re McDonnell’s Estate, , ; , .
  • City of Phoenix v. Anderson 180 P.2d 219 Ariz. 1947
  • City of Phoenix v. Anderson 180 P.2d 219 Ariz. 1947