Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Moore, 609 P.2d 575.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Yak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Yak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    We will uphold a trial court’s finding of a violation “unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”
  • State v. Graham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Graham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    P. 27.8(b)(3); (“The conclusion of the trial court will be upheld unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”) ().
  • State v. Settle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Settle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (We uphold the disposition “unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”).
  • State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (citation omitted); ¶ 18
  • State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “The conclusion of the trial court will be upheld unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”
  • State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Oddo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Oddo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    (noting a trial court’s finding of a probation violation will be upheld “unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence”) ( ).
  • State v. Coven Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Coven Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    “The conclusion of the trial court will be upheld unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.”
  • State v. Shively 323 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Shively 323 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Vaughn, 217 Ariz. at 521, ¶ 14, 176 P.3d at 719
  • State v. Spinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Spinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    We uphold a trial court’s finding of a probation violation “unless it is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.” Two separate conditions of Spinelli’s probation related to the undergoing and completion of domestic violence counseling.
  • State v. Thomas 996 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
  • State v. Thomas 996 P.2d 113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
  • State v. Sheehan 807 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Sheehan 807 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985