Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cope v. Southern Pac. Co., 185 P.2d 772.

46 citing documents.

Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 761 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1988
Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 761 P.2d 1029 Ariz. 1988
Fuller v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 596 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Fuller v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 596 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Valley National Bank v. Brown 517 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1974
Valley National Bank v. Brown 517 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1974
Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of California, , .
Sulpher Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo 481 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Sulpher Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo 481 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
o, sir.” Appellant contends this testimony was inadmissible because it consisted of negative testimony, , In re Schade’s Estate, , , 274 P. 779 (1929); , , Dalton’s Estate v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 350 Mich.
Brand v. J. H. Rose Trucking Co. 418 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Brand v. J. H. Rose Trucking Co. 418 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Diedrich v. Farnsworth 413 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Diedrich v. Farnsworth 413 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
our Supreme Court adopted the rule of Steele v. Kansas City Southern Ry.
Cummings v. Prater 386 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1963
Cummings v. Prater 386 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1963
Campbell v. Brinson 360 P.2d 211 Ariz. 1961
Campbell v. Brinson 360 P.2d 211 Ariz. 1961
775: “ * * * in viewing the evidence to determine whether or not it is such that reasonable men might conclude the fact of negligence, such evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to him who urges that it be submitted to the jury as against the party who urges that no jury question has been
City of Phoenix v. Brown 352 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1960
City of Phoenix v. Brown 352 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1960
Co., , ; , 195 P. 538 , 44 A.L.R.
In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
In Re the Estate of Schade 351 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1960
Co., , ; and see Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence, § 112, 210-211.
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959
Figueroa v. Majors 338 P.2d 803 Ariz. 1959
Figueroa v. Majors 338 P.2d 803 Ariz. 1959
Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of California, , ; Matsumato v. Arizona Sand & Rock Company, supra.
Casey v. Beaudry Motor Company 315 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1957
Casey v. Beaudry Motor Company 315 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1957
speaking for a unanimous court, expressed the same thought: “A verdict will not be directed where the evidence is conflicting, or where, on all the facts and circumstances ‘proven, there is room for fair and sensible men to differ in their conclusions.” (Quoted from syllabus.)
Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Mitchell 292 P.2d 827 Ariz. 1956
Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. Mitchell 292 P.2d 827 Ariz. 1956
Co., , ; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.
Walter v. Southern Arizona School for Boys, Inc. 267 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
Walter v. Southern Arizona School for Boys, Inc. 267 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Renfroe 266 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1954
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Renfroe 266 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1954
Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co. 265 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
Jeune v. Del E. Webb Const. Co. 265 P.2d 1076 Ariz. 1954
Co., , ; Illinois Bankers’ Life Ass’n v. Theodore, , ; , .
McClinton v. Rice 265 P.2d 425 Ariz. 1953
McClinton v. Rice 265 P.2d 425 Ariz. 1953
Co., , ; Dieterlé v. Yellow Cab Co., supra [ 34 Cal.App.2d 97 , ].
Motors Ins. Corp. v. Rhoton 236 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1951
Motors Ins. Corp. v. Rhoton 236 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1951
Drane v. Avery 231 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1951
Drane v. Avery 231 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1951
Co., , ; Dieterle v. Yellow Cab Co., supra ( 34 Cal.App.2d 97 , ) * * *.
Gallaway v. Smith 220 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1950
Gallaway v. Smith 220 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1950
Co., , ; Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., , .” It is also fundamental that the plaintiff need offer no proof in support of such allegations of her complaint as are admitted to be true by the answers filed in the case, and that such admitted facts may be considered as a part o
MacDonald v. Cluff 206 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1949
MacDonald v. Cluff 206 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1949
Nichols v. City of Phoenix 202 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1949
Nichols v. City of Phoenix 202 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1949
Co., , ; Dieterle v. Yellow Cab.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by