Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert, 181 P.2d 624.

72 citing documents.

City of Phoenix v. Industrial Commission 449 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1969
City of Phoenix v. Industrial Commission 449 P.2d 291 Ariz. 1969
‘The words “in the course of” refers to the time, place, and circumstances under which it occurred.’ Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Gilbert, [ , ] supra; , .
Gaumer v. Industrial Commission 382 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1963
Gaumer v. Industrial Commission 382 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1963
1 Where an injury is suffered by an employee while engaged in acts for his own purposes or benefit (other than acts necessary for his personal comfort and convenience while at work) such injury is not in the course of his employment, Goodyear Aircraft Corp.
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial Commission 354 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1960
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial Commission 354 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1960
-383 , , it was stated: “Both the elements ‘arising out of and ‘in the course of employment’ must coexist at one and the same time in order that an award be sustained.
Martin v. Industrial Commission 257 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1953
Martin v. Industrial Commission 257 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1953
71 C.J., Workmen’s Compensation Acts, § 398; , .
Serrano v. Industrial Commission 256 P.2d 709 Ariz. 1953
Serrano v. Industrial Commission 256 P.2d 709 Ariz. 1953
Gomez v. Industrial Commission 230 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1951
Gomez v. Industrial Commission 230 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1951
The Workmen’s Compensation Act, however, does not provide compensation for every injury which an employee may suffer while in his employment, but only where such accident and resulting injury arises out of and in the course of such employment, Ocean Accident & , 257 P. 641; , .
McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks 226 P.2d 147 Ariz. 1950
McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks 226 P.2d 147 Ariz. 1950
Haggard v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1950
Haggard v. Industrial Commission 223 P.2d 915 Ariz. 1950
It is true the act should be given a liberal construction, United States Fidelity & , ; , , and that the courts will not countenance acts or omissions to avoid the statute, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Comm., supra; Industrial Comm.
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission 213 P.2d 672 Ariz. 1950
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission 213 P.2d 672 Ariz. 1950
Goodyear Aircraft Corporation, , .
Martin v. Industrial Commission 213 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1950
Martin v. Industrial Commission 213 P.2d 362 Ariz. 1950
Goodyear Aircraft Corp., , ; , .
Madrigal v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1949
Madrigal v. Industrial Commission 210 P.2d 967 Ariz. 1949